Skip to main content

EFCC amends corruption charges against Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia

Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Friday amended the 30-count charge against Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia, a federal judge, by adding an additional count.
Rotimi Oyedepo, the EFCC counsel, said the amendment became imperative due to new evidence uncovered during investigations.
At the last court sitting, Abdullahi Lawal, an EFCC investigator, while giving evidence said a Customs official paid N12 million into Mrs. Ofili-Ajumogobia’s bank account. The judge had sustained an objection to the witness’s statement on the grounds that it was unrelated to the charges before the court.
Mr. Oyedepo said the amendment of the charge is in line with the application for amendment of information filed on February 22. The count was increased in the new charge from 30 to 31 and the defendants were asked to renew their plea.
The EFCC had arraigned Mrs. Ofili-Ajumogobia and Godwin Obla, a senior lawyer and a former prosecutor for the EFCC, on two counts of perverting the course of justice.
Mr. Obla is facing additional two counts of offering gratification of N5 million to Mrs. Ofili-Ajumogobia while the latter was serving as a judge.
Mrs. Ofili-Ajumogobia was further charged with a 26-count of unlawful enrichment, taking property by a public officer, corruption, forgery, and giving false information to an official of the EFCC.
While cross-examining Mr. Lawal on Friday, Robert Clarke, counsel to Mrs. Ofili-Ajumogobia asked if the EFCC operative had checked the National Judicial Policy and whether he would be surprised to know that the policy of the federal government is that a judicial officer is entitled to receive gifts whether money, land or any gift.
In his response, Mr. Lawal said, “I am aware of customary gifts maybe during Xmas, New Year and so. I’m not aware they can receive monetary gifts and co.
Asking if he knew there is a distinct difference between a public officer and a judicial officer, stating that they continually referred to the first defendant, Mrs. Ofili-Ajumogobia, as a public officer, Mr. Lawal said, “I am not a lawyer and didn’t draft the charges. There is no difference. A judicial officer is a public officer. You are either employed by the government (public) or private.”
Mr. Clarke probed further, “Do you know the background of the first defendant? Twenty-one of the charges is on unlawful enrichment, what would you refer to as lawful income of a judge? If she receives money from her shares from investments in her early years, how would you qualify it?”
In response, Mr. Lawal said, “A judge’s lawful income is from the employer. If the money used to buy the stock are legitimate then the dividend is legitimate.”
On how he came to the conclusion that the money paid to the judge by Mr. Obla constituted unlawful enrichment, the witness said the second defendant was prosecuting a case before the first defendant at the time he paid the money to her.
“There was no business transaction between the first defendant and second defendant’s companies. Also there was a meeting between them in which account number was exchanged in the absence of the defence counsel. Justice Ajumogobia initially denied knowing Godwin obla and later claimed it was for goods. The second defendant, Godwin Obla, denied the claim the first defendant made on the purpose of the payment.”
On the monies he gave evidence in court as being paid by Custom officials, Mr. Clarke asked if the witness was aware that the Customs had come to court and given evidence that they didn’t know the purpose for the payment, the witness said he was not aware they had given such evidence in court.
Mr. Clarke also asked if the witness was aware that one Chief Gregory, a former employer of the judge had given evidence in court that the N18 million he paid into the judge’s account was a loan.
Mr. Lawal replied, “Chief Gregory said the money from him was a loan but I believe its unlawful enrichment. The payment was not a gift. The loan was collected with the intention of not repaying because she stopped picking his calls and used it for deposit on her property abroad.”
Pleading fatigue, Mr. Clarke requested for an adjournment to continue the cross examination of Mr. Lawal.
The judge, Hakeem Oshodi, adjourned till March 23 for continuation of cross examination of the witness.
                 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Woman allegedly burns her boyfriend and their four-year-old daughter to death in South Africa

                               A man and his four-year-old daughter died after they were allegedly  doused with petrol and set alight by man's partner. Khulekani Mshibe and the couple's little girl died from severe burn wounds sustained last Sunday at their home. The girl died at Bheki Mlangeni District Hospital in Jabulani, while Mshibe later died after being transferred to Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital. The woman and the couple's other daughter, aged one, who were also burnt during the incident, are in a critical condition at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital. Neighbours, who spoke to The Sowetan, said the couple's relationship had been volatile and they had heard them argue frequently. One neighbour, who asked not to be named, said he had ignored the noise coming from the couple's home on Saturday night as simply another dispute. "We knew that they fought a lot. We ...

Nigerian man shot dead in South Africa, his car stolen

A Nigerian national identified simply as Chidi was killed by suspected hijackers in South Africa. According to his friend, Taiwo Saheed who is based in Pretoria, the incident happened last Sunday night in Mpumalanga Nelspruit. "Sad news again gone to soon brother  he was shot last night by unknown guys at hazy view mpumalanga nelspruit they even collect his car only God know what  story behind this gentle man killing rest in peace my dear brother #Chidi."

Police close in on Turkish School pupils’ abductors.

The police have discovered where the kidnappers who abducted 10 students and staff of the Nigerian Turkish International College are keeping their hostages, it was learnt yesterday A top police source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the identities of the kidnappers had also been uncovered. The location, he added, was in the creeks, but detectives who were on the abductors’ trail could not access the place for fear of endangering the captives. “We know the exact location in the creek where the children and members of staff are kept but we cannot storm the place because the lives of the children are in danger. “We would not make mistake of attempting the creek because there is no how the kidnappers will not see us coming and they may end up killing their victims. We need the assistance of the Nigerian Air Force (NAF) and the Nigerian Army, who we think have the wherewithal to penetrate the creek through the air,” he said. Another police source disclosed that the i...